Is using Eridia compatible with legal privilege?

Yes. In an isolated configuration on your infrastructure, AI processing stays within your perimeter. Optional external integrations may involve safeguarded transit, as described in our privacy policy.

Which legal sources are integrated?

The Eridia Law module queries Légifrance (consolidated statutes), Judilibre (case law) and Pappers (company data). Answers systematically cite their sources.

Do we need an IT team to install it?

No. Eridia handles the full installation on your infrastructure or private cloud in one day, then trains your teams. You can also start immediately with the EU-hosted SaaS.

Which AI models are available?

All major models (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek…) plus open-source models running locally for the most sensitive matters.

Eridia

Book a demo

Sovereign AI for lawyers and legal teams

Research, analyse and draft with AI while preserving your clients' privilege.

Book a demo

Example: a team member asks a question, Eridia reads the files and answers with its sources.

Valmont Distribution ended its contract with Brisac Logistique without notice. What is the risk under the abrupt termination rules, and what damages should we estimate?

I read 3 documents:Com. Code, art. L. 442-1Judilibre · 14 decisionsPappers · Brisac Logistique SAS

Abrupt termination risk: high

9 yrs

Length of relationship

since March 2017

0 days

Notice given

terminated 02/02/2026

9 to 12 mo

Reasonable notice

based on case law

~€310k

Estimated exposure

lost gross margin

Why law firms can't use generic AI

Privilege rules out US-hosted APIs

Briefs, exhibits, legal opinions: every prompt sent to a generic AI transits through servers outside the EU. A professional-conduct risk no firm can take.

Generic AI doesn't know your legal system

Without access to authoritative legal databases, generic AI hallucinates references, which makes it unusable for serious legal work.

No audit trail, no control

Who asked what, with which data? Consumer tools offer no audit logs and no access management, which is incompatible with your obligations.

What Eridia brings to your firm

AI agents deployed on your premises, with a dedicated legal module.

Sourced legal research

The Eridia Law module natively queries Légifrance, Judilibre and Pappers: every answer cites its sources, with current statutes and case law.

Eridia

Force majeure unlikely, hardship worth reviewing

Force majeure: Civil Code, art. 1218: the event must be beyond the debtor's control, unforeseeable and prevent performance. Higher costs are generally not enough.¹
Hardship: art. 1195: an unforeseeable change making performance excessively onerous allows a party to request renegotiation, unless the contract excludes it.²
To check: does the contract exclude article 1195? Review the indexation and hardship clauses before advising the client.³

Civil Code, art. 1218Civil Code, art. 1195Judilibre · 9 decisions

Contract and document analysis

Upload contracts, briefs and exhibits: the AI analyzes them, flags risky clauses and answers your questions, without any document leaving your infrastructure.

4 risky clauses identified

Clause	Section	Risk	Recommendation
Territorial exclusivity	s. 4.2	High	Cap at 3 years
Termination for convenience	s. 14.1	High	At least 12 months' notice
Limitation of liability	s. 11	Medium	Carve out gross negligence
Jurisdiction	s. 19	Low	Lyon Commercial Court

Meeting and hearing summaries

Automatic recording, transcription and summarization of client meetings, with decisions and action items extracted.

Client call: Groupe Ferrand litigation

04/03/2026 · 3 participants · 52 min

Overview

Preparation for the 9 April hearing in Groupe Ferrand's dispute with its former subcontractor. The 2024 exchanges are key. The strategy for disclosing exhibits is still open.

Actions

Mr Ferrand: send the 2024 emails before 11/03
Ms Laurent: memo on whether to file the sensitive exhibits
Next step: brief review on 25/03

Internal knowledge search

Find a precedent, a template or a past opinion in 3 seconds across the firm's entire document base.

Firm template MED-07 · adapted

Formal notice: Atelier Morvan v. Solvia Équipements

Background

Invoices no. 2025-114, 2025-131 and 2025-152, totalling €48,600 incl. VAT, are overdue and remain unpaid despite two reminders.

Formal notice

Under article 1344 of the Civil Code, you are hereby given formal notice to pay this amount within eight days of receiving this letter.

Failing payment

Our client will bring the matter before the competent court and claim late payment penalties and the €40 fixed fee under article L. 441-10 of the Commercial Code.